SCNAT and its network are committed to a sustainable science and society. They support policy-making, administration and business with expert knowledge and actively participate in public discourse. They strengthen the exchange across scientific disciplines and promote early career academics.

Image: Sebastian, stock.adobe.com

Circular economy: a commentary from the perspectives of the natural and social sciences

The issue of a circular economy has been controversial since the new European Commission decided to cancel proposals from 2014, that would have encouraged a circular economy, and to issue a new package by the end of 2015. The European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC) responded with the contribution by a working group of natural scientists and economists to the debate on the principles and objectives of the European policy.

EASAC Commentary "Circular economy: a commentary from the perspectives of the natural and social sciences"
Image: European Academies Science Advisory Council (EASAC)

Their comments provide natural and social science perspectives of the issues at stake. They include a summary of the conclusions of recent studies on the estimated potential benefits of a circular economy as well as some of the history on the evolution of the political debate from recycling, resource efficiency to the current term circular economy.

Delegated by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences, Professor Gunther Stephan chaired this EASAC Working Group. Holding positions at the Department of Economics and the Oeschger Center of Climate Change Research of the University of Berne, he has an expertise from both the natural and social sciences.

Pages: 17

Categories

English